Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

RE (tilly) 4: Threads vs Forking (Java vs Perl)

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Aug 25, 2000 at 21:25 UTC ( #29653=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE (tilly) 2: Threads vs Forking (Java vs Perl)
in thread Threads vs Forking (Java vs Perl)

Well it is more anti-SMP than anything else. :-)

But at a deeper level it is about why forking entire copies of the OS into a virtual cluster should scale better than trying the multi-threaded SMP approach. So yes, it does support forking.

Besides which, if you take this approach, then on monster boxes forking should scale better than threading.

An incidental note. There are problems that the 4 CPU box can outperform the 16-processor cluster at. But for most people the cluster is a better answer, and Linus is very aware of that.

  • Comment on RE (tilly) 4: Threads vs Forking (Java vs Perl)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://29653]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (8)
As of 2016-07-28 21:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    What is your favorite alternate name for a (specific) keyboard key?


















    Results (258 votes). Check out past polls.