Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks chromatic writing perl on a camel
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

by Juerd (Abbot)
on Oct 13, 2003 at 19:02 UTC ( #298927=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?
in thread Short routines matter more in OO?

One of the tasks of a programmer is to manage complexity.

I like to manage complexity by breaking down the complexity into classes and methods, and keep those methods small AND simple. I know that short doesn't have to mean simple. See Attribute::Property. I also know that simple doesn't have to mean short. But more often than not, they have everything to do with eachother.

Well, the head-in-the-sand tactic is a common defense of personal opinion.

Personal study has shown that the sand is nice and warm.

Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://298927]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-04-16 17:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (433 votes), past polls