Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

by Juerd (Abbot)
on Oct 13, 2003 at 19:02 UTC ( #298927=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?
in thread Short routines matter more in OO?

One of the tasks of a programmer is to manage complexity.

I like to manage complexity by breaking down the complexity into classes and methods, and keep those methods small AND simple. I know that short doesn't have to mean simple. See Attribute::Property. I also know that simple doesn't have to mean short. But more often than not, they have everything to do with eachother.

Well, the head-in-the-sand tactic is a common defense of personal opinion.

Personal study has shown that the sand is nice and warm.

Juerd # { site => '', plp_site => '', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://298927]
[LanX]: ah... Denmark is planning to build a wall at the German border!
[LanX]: # Pestis Africana Suum
[erix]: that's an old plan, I think. Isn't there already a danewal (or some such name)?
[marto]: Build with -Wall
[erix]: Danewerk
[LanX]: I seem to remember that the danewall was build by the Frankish empire against the Danes
[erix]: 500 AD thru viking age

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2018-03-22 18:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (283 votes). Check out past polls.