Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Cowboy Neal with Hat
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: A few Perl OOP questions. (disparaging)

by Zaxo (Archbishop)
on Oct 24, 2003 at 06:30 UTC ( #301805=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: A few Perl OOP questions. (disparaging)
in thread A few Perl OOP questions.

tye, the original query was about OO perl. I mentioned that the idiom gets criticised. In the followup, I explained why in terms of OO practice. Allowing object methods to set class metadata is a bad thing because it allows things which should not interact to change each other's behavior.

I see no FUD in my statement of that: "class methods and instance methods should be distinct and disjoint". There is no fear there, and it seem a quite certain and undoubting statement. Is that what you really object to?

What do you mean by '.. no "do this instead"'? I gave two distinct strategies for avoiding the construct.

Are you trying to get me to suggest some new perl syntax to somehow make things alright? I won't do that. The syntax is not the issue. If you have use for ref($class) || $class, be my guest.

BTW, why wouldn't I name a constructor new? I usually do unless I call it frobozz or clone or connect.

Throughout this thread you've been putting words in my mouth. Please stop that.

After Compline,
Zaxo


Comment on Re^5: A few Perl OOP questions. (disparaging)
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://301805]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-04-16 05:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (414 votes), past polls