Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions

by welchavw (Pilgrim)
on Nov 07, 2003 at 14:49 UTC ( #305308=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
in thread Nested Quantum::Superpositions

Ok. Realizing that all(1,4)!= all(1,4) helps me a bunch - thanks to all posters. As a followup, it seems to me that the docs must be in error when they imply that the following code could ever work...

$ideal = any( all("tall", "rich", "handsome"), all("rich", "old"), all("smart","Australian","rich") ); while (@features = get_description) { if (any(@features) eq $ideal) { print "True love"; } }

After all, I think that it has been illustrated that an "n-all" where n>1 cannot eq anything. Am I wrong?

update: Of course, I am wrong about this. I must have had those Friday-morning blinders on. An "n-all" cannot eq an "n-all" of the same order (update: except if ni=C for 0<=i<=ordern-1 (e.g. all(1,1,1) == all(1,1,1)), but that doesn't mean that an any can't match "n-all" of order > 1. My bad.

upupdate: Fantastic! Now, I actually understand the Q::S operators. Many thanks to Tilly (and also for reporting the docs bug). I really had to struggle to get used to distributing the operator joining each composite superposition across the cross-products (or something like that!). Then, everything clicked (here's to hoping it stays clicked). Q::S is really a neat package, IMHO, but a bit of a mind-bender initially.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
by TheDamian (Priest) on Nov 07, 2003 at 21:07 UTC
    Q::S is really a neat package, IMHO, but a bit of a mind-bender initially.
    Obviously for their inventor too, since he apparently couldn't even get a simple example right in the docs! ;-)

    I'm sure the module's new maintainer will update them accordingly for the next release.

    Meanwile I do appreciate the bug report. One of the projects I'm currently working on is finalizing the semantics of Perl 6 junctions, which are an evolution of quantum superpositions. One of my goals is to simplify those semantics to make them a little more intuitive/predictable, and a lot less mind-bending.

    Being able to watch your learning process in this thread has been of real value to me in doing that. Thank-you.

    And thanks to tilly for the usual masterful explanations, for the bug report, and especially for drawing my (all too thinly spread) attention to this thread.

      Just a bit more of mind-bending: is there a solution the the equation: x = all(1,4)?
        Just a bit more mind-bending: is there a solution the the equation: x = all(1,4)?

        That isn't all that mind-bending actually:

        use Quantum::Superpositions; my $x = all(any(1,4),any(1,4)); #also: all(any(1,4),any(1,4)) if($x == all(1,4)){ print "Solved\n"; }
Re: Re: Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
by tilly (Archbishop) on Nov 07, 2003 at 15:19 UTC
    Let's try it.
    use Quantum::Superpositions; my $all = all("smart","Australian","rich"); my $any = any("smart","Australian","rich"); print "Yes 1\n" if $all eq $any; print "Yes 2\n" if $any eq $all; __END__ Yes 1
    Reading this as I suggested above explains the result. Unfortunately the documentation doesn't clarify this important point, and worse yet, gets it backwards in its example. I'll send a bug report to the current maintainer (Steven Lembark).

    UPDATE: Reported. (BTW I find it charming that "True love" is impossible to find...)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://305308]
LanX what?
marto deletes himself from the all lists
QM deletes himself from all delete lists
LanX passes the blame to jdpatches. ..
Eily the verb from this sentence

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (11)
As of 2018-03-20 10:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (249 votes). Check out past polls.