Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Hidden updates ;-(

by vacant (Monk)
on Nov 22, 2003 at 09:19 UTC ( #309139=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Hidden updates ;-(

In modest defense of updating a node:

It makes sense (after a fashion), in a chatty discussion engine (like, say, NNTP, or fark.com) to disallow the editing of postings after they are committed, for the reasons discussed here. But it often occurs, particularly on USENET, that the thread degenerates into a mob attacking some hapless poster who is unable to change what he wrote.

But is it not more to the purpose of the Monastery that we build a collection of the most useful nodes possible? That end would seem to be better served by correcting and improving the original node in response to the discussion. Of course the editing will always reflect the judgment of the editor, with which there will be, naturally, disagreement. Careful composition of each post so that it stands on its own, and can be understood and judged on its own, will alleviate the dependence upon other posts, reduce the appearance of contentiousness, and create a better, more useful node, all at the same time.


Comment on Re: Hidden updates ;-(

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://309139]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-07-26 18:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (178 votes), past polls