Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

RE: Revisiting Super Search

by athomason (Curate)
on Sep 17, 2000 at 23:47 UTC ( #32889=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Revisiting Super Search

Wow, so there actually is support for such an idea. I raised the issue three months ago at Search Options, but no one replied! Some specifics related to your suggestions:

  • I'd like to see results sorted by Rep.
    I'd rather have a set of options for ranking, like post date, rep, hits per page, etc.
  • I'd also like to be able to search posts by author.
    A great idea.
  • I'd like to not have all the perlman pages show up so often.
    More generally, I'd like to be able to sift out nodes based on what area they were in (with a multi-select fieldmajigger). That way you wouldn't find Running With Scissors when you were looking for "running with scissors".

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Revisiting Super Search
by ddd (Acolyte) on Sep 19, 2000 at 19:54 UTC
    I'd like to not have all the perlman pages show up so often.
    More generally, I'd like to be able to sift out nodes based on what area they were in (with a multi-select...

    At the risk of making this thread needlessly long, I'd like to see search return all matches by default.
    (Of course turning off the categories you don't want to see is also important)

    My opinions are expressed on behalf of:

    • myself - old hand at perl, new to perlmonks
    • my co-workers - new to perl, users, but not active participants of perlmonks

    All the best,
    DouglasDD

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://32889]
help
Chatterbox?
[1nickt]: ... sign I have seen ...
[1nickt]: Now that one made me hopeful! First time not angry in a long time when I saw that kid.
[Discipulus]: i propend for removing: why? because we are so few that we must find i minimal common divisor, this is certainly Perl not our (anyway private) thougths. And i say this still wondering because i love a lot freedom of expression. And i say this not for roho
[1nickt]: Discipulus that was the point of my story of taking the sticker off my truck. I know there are lots of people in the world who if I knw their private beliefs I might want to argue with them. And they with me. But life cannot all be arguments!
[1nickt]: This is less than perfect ... but demanding perfection (from people or from life) is a sure way to unhappiness.
[Discipulus]: and anyway we have CB where every (democratic) opinion can be expressed
erix eat the rich!
[1nickt]: I do think it is sad that roho has received 3 downvotes for his polite request, as did I when I objected to the profanity in stonecolddevin's sig. I upvoted both him and Karl for the discussion. Way too much downvoting for inappropriate reasons here!
Discipulus learn that 'argue' has a little negative sense, he thought was a neutral sense, 'vox media'
[1nickt]: argue == discuss && argue == be contentious

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-06-22 12:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (519 votes). Check out past polls.