Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: inheritance turns back and bites

by esskar (Deacon)
on Mar 01, 2004 at 13:46 UTC ( #332894=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: inheritance turns back and bites
in thread inheritance turns back and bites

Always use SUPER instead of the parent-class-name; so in the case of changeing the parent-class, you won't have to replace all the "SomeData::" stuff to the new parent-class-name.
SUPER is pretty super.


Comment on Re: Re: inheritance turns back and bites
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: inheritance turns back and bites
by borisz (Canon) on Mar 01, 2004 at 13:59 UTC
    But SUPER is wrong here, I like to use SomeData or build something with __PACKAGE__.
    Boris
      If your intent is to ensure that increment calls add in the same package, why not use:
      sub increment { my $self = shift; &add($self, number => 1); }
      Use subroutine calls when you want to create your own explicit binding, use -> notation when you desire runtime binding of the message.

      Of course, it would be my opinion that it is particularly bad form for a child class to re-implement a method in a manner that is not backward compatible - it's a violation of the contract as far as I'm concerned.

      --Toby Ovod-Everett

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://332894]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-29 02:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls