No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
As an incurable stats fiend, my first thought was "Cool, more stats!"
But on second thought, do we really want to encourage controversy by publicly quantifying it? There will always be disagreements and that's truly A Good Thing(TM), but I could do without a Most Controversial Nodes node.
Update: s/encourage controversy/encourage more controversy/
Update 2: I do agree with tye who suggested above that each Monk might benefit from seeing the swing on his/her own nodes.
In reply to RE: plus and minus votes (encourage controversy?)
by ybiC
|
|