comment on

I can see the point, however I propose not more levels, but two categories. One that would get points for good community, and the other for technical experience.

I am a saint because I asked lots of questions and hung out here a lot. But I'm no saintly technical expert. So, I propose points for asking questions and points for answering them.

However, many replies are just asides and really shouldn't count towards technical expertise, and many questions actually offer technical solutions.

So, maybe we have a *pair* of voting buttons for both the question and the reply. One set for community participation, and one for technical. On our home nodes we'd have a total, and title, for each of the two.

Complicated? Yes, but changing it to anything other than what it is would be. My .02

—Brad
"Don't ever take a fence down until you know the reason it was put up." G. K. Chesterton

In reply to Re: A Proposal for Additional Levels by bradcathey
in thread A Proposal for Additional Levels by Petruchio

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks