comment on

I can't say that I've ever had any problem with Anonymous Monks. Most often, for me, their posts have been good and helpful; sometimes, of course, they're not. But I mostly just ignore the bad ones; just as I do with the non-Anonymous Monks' posts.

My thought is that it is a good institution and I have benefited too often from the good wisdom offered by Anonymous Monk to want to give it up. If annonymity helps or seems useful, no matter what the reasons or rationale, then so be it...IMHO.

I would like to see Anonymous Monk stay around and don't have any reason to change the annonymity.

ack Albuquerque, NM

In reply to Re: RFC: Purpose of Robes in Monasteries by ack
in thread RFC: Purpose of Robes in Monasteries by Anonymous Monk

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
	PerlMonks