comment on

Either use JVM or Parrot.

I think Parrot would be a very poor choice relative to the JVM.

The latter has had millions of dollars spent on it and it is very, very advanced. And they just turned out a release candidate for Java 7. It is proven technology that runs pretty much everywhere. And dozens of non-Java languages have been implemented on it. Many of those are in the public domain and so are ready examples of how to go about it.

My point about JNode is that they have done all the hard work. If you write a Perl interpreter that targets the JVM, the rest of the job is already done by JNode.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

In reply to Re^3: Anyone interested in coding a _real_ Perl OS? by BrowserUk
in thread Anyone interested in coding a _real_ Perl OS? by dosadi

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot
	PerlMonks