Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (tye)Re: New code wrap options

by demerphq (Chancellor)
on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:01 UTC ( #336237=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (tye)Re: New code wrap options
in thread New code wrap options

If someone wants a class designation for this, then come up with a nice, short, clear name for the class.

class="fragment"

However getting short and clear at the same times seems to me to be setting the bar too high. Maybe having one without the other is preferable?


---
demerphq

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
    -- Gandhi


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class)
by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:06 UTC

    Well, I'd just do "inlinecode".

    - tye        

      Yep, that was my original though as well, but it seemed too long considering your requirements. I actually thought of suggesting 'icode' but thought that wasnt sufficiently clear. 'inline' or 'inlinecode' seems good to me, as does 'fragment' still.


      ---
      demerphq

        First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
        -- Gandhi


Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://336237]
help
Chatterbox?
[choroba]: I'm in the lowest category, too
[choroba]: but in the country, that's in fact still a lot of money
[choroba]: "data dumber" is a nice typo, btw

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-04-27 08:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (501 votes). Check out past polls.