Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

RE: YACR (Yet Another Chatterbox Request)

by arturo (Vicar)
on Sep 26, 2000 at 18:32 UTC ( #34015=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to YACR (Yet Another Chatterbox Request)

personally, I find the temptation to treat the chatterbox like IRC pretty hard to resist. Wouldn't it be nice if there were a #perlmonks channel on some server somewhere? And if there is, that perhaps that could be better advertised?

I suppose there's an accessibility issue with IRC (i.e. you need something other than just a web browser to use it; but then, that's already the case with the chatterbox clients)

Surely the collective we is not so opposed to, say, a java client accessible through a webpage that having a channel like that wouldn't be feasible.

Philosophy can be made out of anything -- or less


Comment on RE: YACR (Yet Another Chatterbox Request)
RE (tilly) 2: YACR (Yet Another Chatterbox Request)
by tilly (Archbishop) on Sep 26, 2000 at 19:08 UTC
    I stand definitely opposed.

    At home and at work I am behind different firewalls which I do not control. While I could get around them, I prefer not to. Therefore IRC or random new protocols are and shall remain inaccessible to me. (In practice if not in theory.)

(jcwren) RE: (2) YACR (Yet Another Chatterbox Request)
by jcwren (Prior) on Sep 26, 2000 at 19:16 UTC
    Actually, there is, and has been for sometime, a #perlmonks on the SlashNet servers. It was created by chromatic.

    --Chris

    e-mail jcwren

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://34015]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-03 07:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (49 votes), past polls