Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

RE: threaded discussion maybe? (box utilization)

by ybiC (Prior)
on Sep 29, 2000 at 05:38 UTC ( #34550=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to threaded discussion maybe?

Something like this was proposed a while back, japhy, and it sounded good to me.   If I remember right, the request was for a "jump to top of thread" link on each and every reply node, but that it would add humongously to box utilization (and to response times), so was shot down.

I'm no DB guru, but suspect your idea might have the same show-stopping drawback.   If I'm wrong, doubtless some fine Monk will set the record straight.   8^)   If I can dig up the thread, I'll add an Update:
    cheers,
    [ybiC}


Comment on RE: threaded discussion maybe? (box utilization)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://34550]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-28 13:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (181 votes), past polls