Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Apocalypse 12 (VPoBBRCB)

by tye (Sage)
on Apr 20, 2004 at 04:58 UTC ( #346545=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Apocalypse 12
in thread Apocalypse 12

I'll be the VP of Bring-Back-Ref-Counting bitching. But I'll continue to do the vast majority of my bitching the Lazy Way. If I do nothing for long enough, I'm certain to get ref-counting back into Perl (you had to be there).

- tye        

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^3: Apocalypse 12 (VPoBBRCB)
by ysth (Canon) on Apr 21, 2004 at 01:05 UTC
    Hear hear! I'll go one further and say that perl5's stack should be refcounted. Death to Mortals! No more Temps! Just say NO to Reification!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://346545]
help
Chatterbox?
[Eily]: I just wrote a oneliner to solve a (non perl) colleague's problem, and it worked on the first try
[Eily]: and he wasn't impressed
1nickt adds gingersnaps to the platter on the sideboard.
[Eily]: sure it was a pretty standard one liner (of the $h{$1} = $2 if /regex/; END { pp \%h; } variety), but he's not supposed to know that!
[Eily]: what's the point of writing perl if people aren't impressed :P

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-04-26 15:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (482 votes). Check out past polls.