Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re^3: Jump to head (replying to)

by flyingmoose (Priest)
on May 17, 2004 at 19:36 UTC ( #354073=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Jump to head (replying to)
in thread Jump to head

I don't like spawning new windows. IMHO, HTML targets shouldn't ever spawn new windows. Most of the time us Mozilla-philes want no part of new windows, hence why tabbed browsing is so cool. And yep, I do instinctively open nearly everything in a new tab -- I hate it when a link is javascript or something and it doesn't want to act like normal HTML.


Comment on Re: Re^3: Jump to head (replying to)
Re^5: Jump to head (replying to)
by tye (Cardinal) on May 17, 2004 at 20:57 UTC
    And yep, I do instinctively open nearly everything in a new tab

    Then what do you care what the default target is? In a reasonable browser, requesting that a link be opened into a tab should open it in a tab even if target="_new" is the suggested default behavior in the HTML of the link. This is how my copy of Mozilla behaves.

    I hate it when a link is javascript or something and it doesn't want to act like normal HTML

    I was not considering javascript nor indeed anything other than HTML.

    So the suggested feature would only affect you when you forget to open the link in a new tab. In that case, would you rather have a new window pop up which you can just close if it bothers you, or have the in-process preview be replaced by a new page with the risk that going "Back" doesn't restore your text from the browser cache and the node contents that you were composing are simply lost?

    I don't find that design decision at all difficult (and I particularly dislike target="_new" in most cases).

    Further, for this particular use, I'd find jumping between two tabs (only one of which can be visible at once) to be the wrong way to consult a thread while I was composing a reply to it. So, even if I were in the habit of opening links into tabs, in this particular case I'd make an exception and open a new window so I could view the original node while I'm typing the reply.

    - tye        

      Then what do you care what the default target is?
      I care. I hate every website that fucks around with defaults. A link that opens in a new window is not the default. Whether something should open in the same window, a new window, a new tab, or even a new browser or a new computer, should be under the user's control. Button-1 for opening in the same window, Button-3 for opening in a new window, or whatever is one's preference (perhaps even with a style sheet). Web authors who think they know better than the user what the user wants should burn in hell.

      Abigail

        >   burn in hell.  ++
        and for ever!

        pelagic

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://354073]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-07-31 02:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (244 votes), past polls