Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Regrettable module names

by biosysadmin (Deacon)
on Jul 04, 2004 at 09:29 UTC ( #371692=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Regrettable module names
in thread Regrettable module names

I like this one. The only thing that I think you could possibly do better would be to imply the Protocol somehow and just name it Acme::Remote::Strangulation. Also, some code examples in the perldoc would be nice too. :)


Comment on Re^2: Regrettable module names
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by TStanley (Canon) on Jul 04, 2004 at 16:54 UTC
    Thank you for the suggestions :-) I will put them in my To-Do list for the module.

    TStanley
    --------
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing -- Edmund Burke
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by ChemBoy (Priest) on Jul 06, 2004 at 16:05 UTC

    Shouldn't it be Acme::Strangulation::Remote? Seems more in keeping with the general-to-specific idea of name spaces...



    If God had meant us to fly, he would *never* have given us the railroads.
        --Michael Flanders

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://371692]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-29 01:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls