Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

RE: RE: man perlvar != perlman:perlvar ?

by merlyn (Sage)
on Oct 26, 2000 at 03:13 UTC ( #38523=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RE: man perlvar != perlman:perlvar ?
in thread man perlvar != perlman:perlvar ?

Well, a label is fine. But the online docs are in fact the most recent stable version of Perl, so it wouldn't make sense to update them until 5.6.1 comes out.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

Comment on RE: RE: man perlvar != perlman:perlvar ?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE (tilly) 3: man perlvar != perlman:perlvar ?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Oct 26, 2000 at 06:38 UTC
    It varies from doc to doc, but try tie and you will see that, like Camel 2, many of them are actually 5.003 specific.

    There was a thread once where someone was massively bit by this because perldiag mentioned nothing about a warning involving "our"...

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://38523]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-10-10 11:27 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (255 votes), past polls