Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

(dchetlin - static vs. closure) RE(3): lexical weirdness(?)

by dchetlin (Friar)
on Oct 26, 2000 at 07:42 UTC ( #38549=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: lexical weirdness(?)
in thread lexical weirdness(?)

There are at least two major differences between closures and static-via-my-if-0 variables.

Here's the first. Look closely at this code and see if you can figure out what its output will be before you run it.

#!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; { my $closure; sub func_w_closure { print "Closure! ", $closure++, "\n"; func_w_closure($_[0]+1) if $_[0] < 3; } } sub func_w_static { my $static if 0; print "Static! ", $static++, "\n"; func_w_static($_[0]+1) if $_[0] < 3; } func_w_closure(0); func_w_static(0);

I'll use tilly's spoiler trick:

[~] $ dev/test/scope.pl Closure! 0 Closure! 1 Closure! 2 Closure! 3 Static! 0 Static! 0 Static! 0 Static! 0

In other words, the closure is the same variable through all calls, including recursive ones, while each recursive call to the func_w_static gets its own copy.

The cool thing about that, of course, is that if you call func_w_closure again, you see that each recursive instance keeps its value!

The other difference is that closures can be shared among functions -- if you stick another function into the lexical scope of `$static' above, some_function and your new function will refer to the same variable.

-dlc


Comment on (dchetlin - static vs. closure) RE(3): lexical weirdness(?)
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://38549]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-07 04:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (87 votes), past polls