Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Compaq's WebL language

by htoug (Deacon)
on Aug 26, 2004 at 13:01 UTC ( #385998=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: To mechanize WWW::Mechanize: a scraping language?
in thread To mechanize WWW::Mechanize: a scraping language?

I just had a look at it, and I must say:
  Yuck!!!
It look's a bit like the worst of Pascal and ECMAScript rolled into one.

Why not stay with Perl for doing thing like this? You will probably end up needing a full language to do anything serious, and then you will have to reinvent Perl!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Compaq's WebL language
by mojotoad (Monsignor) on Aug 26, 2004 at 20:47 UTC
    I agree that it's not pretty -- perl is better suited for most, if not all, of the tasks it accomplishes.

    What I had in mind was leveraging existing WeBL scripts, or translating them. Also, if you look at the problem space that WeBL addresses, it serves as a good source of sign posts for the sort of constructs you'd want for a general purpose web-weasel language.

    Matt

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://385998]
help
Chatterbox?
and the daffodils sway...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-07-22 07:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I came, I saw, I ...
























    Results (337 votes). Check out past polls.