Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

(ar0n) RE: Considering nodes to consider

by ar0n (Priest)
on Oct 27, 2000 at 00:59 UTC ( #38727=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Considering nodes to consider

I'm forgetful and lazy, so when I do remember to check out the Nodes to consider page, I'm often too lazy to type it into the search-box. A link somewhere near the top of the page to Nodes to consider would be nice.

[ar0n]

  • Comment on (ar0n) RE: Considering nodes to consider

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: (ar0n) RE: Considering nodes to consider
by Adam (Vicar) on Oct 27, 2000 at 03:59 UTC
    I have it in my personal nodelet. But I stoped visiting the page when I realized that there was no effect.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://38727]
help
Chatterbox?
[marto]: I always found Strawberry Perl on windows to be a much better environment, made life much easier
[marto]: pp. install it like you would any other module
[marto]: it probably exists in one of the PPM repositories
[marto]: failing that see the README
[mark4]: I installed "PAR" from the ppm install window. pp.exe. did not show up.
[marto]: it should just be a script, pp, or on windows pp.bat, post install you should just be able to call pp -x packed.exe source.pl as the PPM package should put everything required into the appropriate path
[marto]: ah, some time ago pp became it's own package, try searching your repo for PAR::Packer
[marto]: again, Strawberry + cpanm for the win: cpanm pp to install

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-01-19 14:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (218 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?