Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: if variants

by apotheon (Deacon)
on Oct 21, 2004 at 08:46 UTC ( #401088=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: if variants
in thread if variants

I can understand avoiding the != in an if statement, since using unless covers that functionality. I don't know why unless . . . else would be "bad", however. Explain?

- apotheon
CopyWrite Chad Perrin


Comment on Re^4: if variants
Re^5: if variants
by DrHyde (Prior) on Oct 22, 2004 at 09:22 UTC
    In English, saying "if this, do that, else do the other" makes sense and is easy for a person to parse. However "unless this, do that, else do the other" is much harder to parse because the "else" clause is a double negative (or even a triple negative if you have "unless not this"). Same applies to perl.

    While you could, perhaps, argue that "if not this, do that, else do the other" is also a double negative, it's still easy to parse because it's familiar. We see it in every programming language ever.

      In short, then, it's a readability issue. Got it. Thanks.

      I think my facility for formal and symbolic logic systems probably makes it more difficult for me than for most people to recognize when some complex representation of a logical expression is difficult to parse by eye.

      - apotheon
      CopyWrite Chad Perrin

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://401088]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-26 02:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls