Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Command line tool coding style?

by muba (Priest)
on Oct 23, 2004 at 20:56 UTC ( #401882=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Command line tool coding style?

It took me a while to figure out what you were doing, but after a while I finally discovered. It looks nice, but... isn't it easier to create a hash with the possible $_actions?

Update: Hmm... it's an almost 3 years old thread. Should have checked that before posting.





"2b"||!"2b";$$_="the question"
Besides that, my code is untested unless stated otherwise.
One more: please review the article about regular expressions (do's and don'ts) I'm working on.


Comment on Re: Command line tool coding style?
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Command line tool coding style?
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Oct 24, 2004 at 03:55 UTC

    Using a hash would be the simple option, indeed, but leads to less generalized code. If I had to do something like this again, I'd do it precisely as perrin suggested.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://401882]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-31 08:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (275 votes), past polls