Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: How about footpads old proposal?

by FoxtrotUniform (Prior)
on Oct 26, 2004 at 20:17 UTC ( #402789=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to How about footpads old proposal?
in thread A Proposal for Additional Levels

I'll second that. What I like about footpad's proposal is that it doesn't mess with the established levels, just adds new ones.

The discussion following the thread is interesting, too.

--
Yours in pedantry,
F o x t r o t U n i f o r m

"Lines of code don't matter as long as I'm not writing them." -- merlyn

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://402789]
help
Chatterbox?
[ambrus]: choroba: heh heh... I have such a doc bug report somewhere. fixed by now.
[Corion]: Once upon a time I had automatic tests for checking the synopsis, but I stopped doing that because the setup was too fragile on CPAN testers for extracting code from the SYNOPSIS.
[Corion]: Maybe I should move the extraction of the code from the SYNOPSIS section into the author tests, or something like that...
[choroba]: Corion Sounds reasonable
[Corion]: choroba: Yeah - I basically have the same for regenerating README and README.mkdown already, except that I do that in Makefile.PL, but I guess one or the other thing should somehow work ;)
[ambrus]: was this bug: https://rt.cpan. org/Public/Bug/ Display.html?id= 59814

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-02-27 12:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Before electricity was invented, what was the Electric Eel called?






    Results (383 votes). Check out past polls.