Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re^2: A Proposal for Additional Levels

by Anonymous Monk
on Oct 27, 2004 at 13:19 UTC ( #402992=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: A Proposal for Additional Levels
in thread A Proposal for Additional Levels

You mean, it encourages everyone to put a one line WWW::Mechanize script in their crontab?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: A Proposal for Additional Levels
by eric256 (Parson) on Oct 27, 2004 at 15:46 UTC

    As apposed to now? When they can have a similar vote bot? I mean realy, that reply contributed nothing.

    If votes were doled out and hit a max, say at my level you get 3 votes a day, and can store a max of 30 votes. That pretty much limits the utility of your crontab script. Any way the current system encourages people to spend votes for no reason (like as read markers) where if I only had 3 a day I would not use them in that manner.

    Eric Hodges

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://402992]
[marto]: FWIW, people shipping things as perl, which aren't strictly perl can cause confusion (Perl and OpenWrt - where to the communities intersect?)
[marto]: cpanm is lighter on resources than cpan, which is handy when working with consumer grade NAS hardware

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-03-17 13:23 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (224 votes). Check out past polls.