Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?

by elusion (Curate)
on Nov 05, 2004 at 21:20 UTC ( #405643=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
in thread Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?

And while we're at it,

<p style="display: none"> <font color="red" size="+4">You should be using a browser that support +s CSS!</font><br> <a href="http://mozilla.org">Upgrade now.</a> </p>
;-)


Comment on Re^2: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
Download Code
Re^3: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
by Juerd (Abbot) on Nov 06, 2004 at 13:55 UTC

    Mozilla isn't an *upgrade* if you're using a different browser. I absolutely HATE the term "upgrade" where used instead of "migrate". For the record, Mozilla does NOT have a non-graphical browser. Besides that, not supporting CSS is a right that browsers have and you are not to tell me what to use. A good website maker makes a site usable for any browser. And CSS makes that easy if used right, so stop complaining.

    Note that I have seen your ";-)", but needed to say this because it's the third time I see someone suggesting something like this today.

    Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://405643]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-09-22 20:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (198 votes), past polls