Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Appropriate amount of abstraction

by FoxtrotUniform (Prior)
on Nov 14, 2004 at 23:41 UTC ( #407738=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Appropriate amount of abstraction

It Depends(tm).

If your primary concern is "getting it done", using a high level of abstraction (for instance, Class::DBI rather than plain DBI and hand-written utility functions) will probably result in cleaner, more easily maintained code... as long as the abstraction you pick is the right one. On the other hand, if you're more interested in learning how something works, thick layers of abstraction can get in your way.

From a pedagogical standpoint, I don't know whether it's better to start by teaching a high level of abstraction and moving to lower and lower levels, or to start with the low-level basics and build on those.

Yours in pedantry,
F o x t r o t U n i f o r m

"Anything you put in comments is not tested and easily goes out of date." -- tye

Comment on Re: Appropriate amount of abstraction

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://407738]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-11-29 10:29 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (750 votes), past polls