Re^4: Mysterious "syntax error"

That appears to be deciding how to interpret a bareword, not a '{'. I quickly looked but didn't find the code for guessing at the meaning of a '{', though.

Actually, I'd like to see merlyn download the source from one of those 150 locations and show us how easy it is to find and interpret this code. (:

- tye

Comment on Re^4: Mysterious "syntax error"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Mysterious "syntax error"
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 01, 2004 at 01:22 UTC

Your right. Seems I missed a level of identation (easily done in that source). I also missed another, rather more obvious clue:

# toke.c:3207 (5.8.5)
        /* This hack serves to disambiguate a pair of curlies
         * as being a block or an anon hash.  Normally, expectation
         * determines that, but in cases where we're not in a
         * position to expect anything in particular (like inside
         * eval"") we have to resolve the ambiguity.  This code
         * covers the case where the first term in the curlies is a
         * quoted string.  Most other cases need to be explicitly
         * disambiguated by prepending a `+' before the opening
         * curly in order to force resolution as an anon hash.
         *
         * XXX should probably propagate the outer expectation
         * into eval"" to rely less on this hack, but that could
         * potentially break current behavior of eval"".
         * GSAR 97-07-21
         */
[download]

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"But you should never overestimate the ingenuity of the sceptics to come up with a counter-argument." -Myles Allen
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail "Time is a poor substitute for thought"--theorbtwo "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

[reply]
[d/l]


Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies.
	PerlMonks