Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^2: Review: CGI::Prototype

by FoxtrotUniform (Prior)
on Dec 02, 2004 at 23:03 UTC ( #411989=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Review: CGI::Prototype
in thread Review: CGI::Prototype

I've never understood why CPAN authors put their module numbers so low.

I'd guess that, at the beginning, it's a confidence issue. I'd think of it as, hey, I'm posting a module that seems to work for me, but it hasn't been widely tested yet: let's not get everyone's hopes up. After that, well, small incremental changes don't really merit a major version number increment, do they?

I agree with you; it's always rather odd to see stable, mature software with a sub-1.0 version number (slrn, anyone?). Of course, there's plenty of "production" software that really shouldn't be out of alpha yet.

Yours in pedantry,
F o x t r o t U n i f o r m

"Anything you put in comments is not tested and easily goes out of date." -- tye

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://411989]
[talexb]: Hmm. Trying to figure out how to trigger the author tests. This talks about .author in ./inc, but that doesn't seem to do the trick.
LanX sigh ... pitty I'm not a girl ... missing out on so many things
LanX ... or is it "boying out" ?
[choroba]: RELEASE_TESTING=1 for Module::Starter based distributions
LanX ..."mistering out" ?
[talexb]: choroba AH! Thanks so much.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-10-23 14:21 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

    Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.