Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: A curses-based JAPH

by eyepopslikeamosquito (Chancellor)
on Dec 09, 2004 at 09:09 UTC ( #413459=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to A curses-based JAPH

Since eyespoplikeamosquito laid out a brief history of the JAPH ...

Thanks for the acknowledgement ... despite the spelling variation. ;-) So now I know the merlyn, the larry and the brian have all written a JAPH. What about TheDamian?


Comment on Re: A curses-based JAPH
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: A curses-based JAPH
by TheDamian (Priest) on Dec 11, 2004 at 00:39 UTC
    I've never written one. I suppose if I did, my first attempt might look something like:
    #?<')I;G0G2G5S="!A;F]T:&5R(%!E<FP@:&%C:V5R)P``` eval<DATA>;sub'_{$_=unpack+u=>$_=>until/u(?{eval})/} __DATA__ seek+DATA=>$%,%$;_%;for<DATA>=~'.(.*.).'

      Thanks for that. Very evil, er, nice. /me scribbles some new obfu tricks.

      If I may make a criticism of this first attempt from a JAPH beginner, it is the title. AFAICT, by Perl Monks convention, it should read something like "My First JAPH!!!" and contain a plea to please be kind. ;-)

      Oh, and it's not canonical. To canonicalize, replace the first line with:

      #@<')I;G0G2G5S="!A;F]T:&5R(%!E<FP@:&%C:V5R+"<``
      As a bit of a spoiler, re-formatting the code like this:
      #@<')I;G0G2G5S="!A;F]T:&5R(%!E<FP@:&%C:V5R+"<`` eval<DATA>; sub X { $_ = unpack('u', $_) until /u(?{eval})/ } __DATA__ seek(DATA, 0, 0); X() for <DATA> =~ /.(.*.)./;
      makes it a bit easier to understand.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://413459]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-30 10:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (271 votes), past polls