|
|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: let's have valid htmlby Aristotle (Chancellor) |
| on Dec 19, 2004 at 16:56 UTC ( [id://416006]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
There's a long road ahead till browsers actually support XHTML 2.0 — even decently compliant engines such as Gecko aren't nearly there yet. XHTML 1.1 Strict is what you should aim for at the moment, if you are serious about compliance. It's problematic for us though, for reasons I state elsewhere in the thread. Makeshifts last the longest.
In Section
Inner Scriptorium
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||