Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

RE: No CB comment is serious, and should not be reproduced in a node without research

by extremely (Priest)
on Nov 15, 2000 at 12:01 UTC ( #41734=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to No CB comment is serious, and should not be reproduced in a node without research

I gotta say your points fairly well sum up how I feel about the CB. I was glad I hadn't been quoted and posted for posterity, since I tend to be even goofier in the CB than I normally am in posts.

OTOH, these sort of social conventions twist with the times. I'd rather not codify that which doesn't need ossification. Tomorrow vroom might let us checkbox the best lines and then vote on yesterday's favorites... You never know.

--
$you = new YOU;
honk() if $you->love(perl)

  • Comment on RE: No CB comment is serious, and should not be reproduced in a node without research

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://41734]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: ..but only http not https
[shmem]: hmm after some looping I get it via http
[choroba]: After submitting the form, I'm getting "Sorry, we're really busy right now, please wait for a bit. This page will automagically refresh soon"
[hippo]: Still nothing via https
marto pictures someone trying to fix a problem, while the page gets battered by F5s :P
[hippo]: Who maintains deps? Is it barbie?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (15)
As of 2018-02-20 12:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...














    Results (271 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?