Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Do we ever want to freeze threads?

by Seumas (Curate)
on Dec 31, 2004 at 08:48 UTC ( #418490=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Do we ever want to freeze threads?
in thread Do we ever want to freeze threads?

Because I thought it might be useful to prevent someone replying to a node that's several years old.

There's nothing wrong with replying to a node that's several years old. Why is a discussion over hashes from two years ago no longer valid today?

That's because it's very unlikely that anyone's going to see it, and in any case it's probably in the wrong place.

Of course someone will see it. Discussions are valuable beyond any supposed expiration date. Many people use Search (or even Google) to find very useful old discussions on Perlmonks that help them with current situations. Any contributions made to such threads from the date of creation onward are of value - including the contributions of the person who found it useful.

This isn't Slashdot. Discussions here are valid without end. There is no reason, in 2005, to be discussing how unfair it is that Kevin Mitnick is still being held in prison in an article posted to Slashdot in 2001. However, an in-depth discussion on map/join from 2003 is certainly worthwhile today. That is the major difference.


Comment on Re^3: Do we ever want to freeze threads?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://418490]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-10-23 21:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (129 votes), past polls