|
|
| Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: The Lighter Side of Perl Culture (Part III)by eyepopslikeamosquito (Canon) |
| on Jan 25, 2005 at 09:16 UTC ( #424805=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I think we've been a bit unfair to Mr. Clinick.Agreed. The article as a whole is very positive towards Perl and hugely respectful of Larry Wall and his contribution to the scripting world. I included this quote because it contains a lesson: it shows how Obfuscation Contests can be used as a propaganda weapon to damage Perl's reputation. Since attempting to outlaw Perl obfu contests is clearly absurd, the best we can do to protect Perl's reputation is to respond promptly and accurately -- as brian_d_foy and merlyn did above. BTW, I heard a rumour (but I'm damned if I can find anything with google now) that O'Reilly did not sponsor the TPJ Obfuscated Perl Contests because they felt they would project the wrong image of Perl. Does anyone know if there is any truth to this rumour?
Perl actually stands for Practical Extraction and Report LanguageTo nitpick with Mr Clinick, I refer to the draft Oxford English Dictionary entry cited on history.perl.org: I love it that PERL is considered "irregular". :-)
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||