Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: A room for CPAN Modules discussion?

by monsieur_champs (Curate)
on Feb 11, 2005 at 13:50 UTC ( #430091=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: A room for CPAN Modules discussion?
in thread A room for CPAN Modules discussion?

Fellow Tanktalus wrote:

As for using Perlmonks Discussion as a place for discussing modules - that seems wrong to me, too. This is about discussing perlmonks, not modules (that's what SoPW is for). Which, I suppose, makes this particular thread on-topic here, but what the thread is about would not be on-topic here, IMO.

Dear fellow, I beg your pardon. I don't make myself clear as water at the first post.

I'm using PerlMonks Discussion to suggest a new Category, which name could be Module Parliament, the place where issues like module architecture and adoption of orphaned modules could take place publically, inside PerlMonks (that is a well-advertised, well-known forum for Perl and Community-related discussions).

Hope that now my point is clear like the water from the Monastery fountain.

Peace and Glory


Comment on Re^2: A room for CPAN Modules discussion?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://430091]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (17)
As of 2015-07-07 21:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (93 votes), past polls