Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Array iterator factory (())

by tye (Cardinal)
on Mar 17, 2005 at 16:46 UTC ( #440433=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Array iterator factory
in thread Array iterator factory

Note that &$iter() is just fine (it has none of the problems of &$iter;) and is even better than $iter->() in that it works on fairly old versions of Perl (though enough time has passed since the $iter->() syntax was introduced that few need to worry much about supporting versions of Perl that predate it).

It seems that 'everyone' focuses on the & as being the problem and never mention that ampersand with parens is okay, sometimes even an advantage. Note that the both $iter->() and &$iter() ignore prototypes (since such are only enforced at compile time, a time during which perl doesn't know what function $iter might point to) and neither can be used directly with built-in functions so not even the difference between func() and &func() apply between &$iter() and $iter->().

(tye)Re: A question of style covers much of & and () and calling subroutines.

- tye        


Comment on Re^2: Array iterator factory (())
Select or Download Code
Re^3: Array iterator factory (())
by ihb (Deacon) on Mar 17, 2005 at 19:12 UTC

    It seems that 'everyone' focuses on the & as being the problem and never mention that ampersand with parens is okay, sometimes even an advantage.

    Because I've repeatedly pointed out the issue with &foo; I take the easy way in my replies and don't mention &foo() as the alternative. Instead of elaborating on the same issue once again I'll quote myself. From Re: Hash values and constants:

    I intentionally avoided mentioning & as a way of disambiguate the constant. This is because it will confuse and mislead people to think that you can do &foo; instead of foo(), which isn't the case.
    From Re: Re: Forward-referenceing subs:
    For some reason, it's much more common to drop the parenthesis when dereferencing than when making a regular subroutine call.
    Therefore I consistently use $foo->() as it doesn't leave room for such subtle unexpected behaviour as &$foo; presents.

    ihb

    See perltoc if you don't know which perldoc to read!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://440433]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-10-25 08:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (142 votes), past polls