Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^3: Array iterator factory (())

by ihb (Deacon)
on Mar 17, 2005 at 19:12 UTC ( #440488=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Array iterator factory (())
in thread Array iterator factory

It seems that 'everyone' focuses on the & as being the problem and never mention that ampersand with parens is okay, sometimes even an advantage.

Because I've repeatedly pointed out the issue with &foo; I take the easy way in my replies and don't mention &foo() as the alternative. Instead of elaborating on the same issue once again I'll quote myself. From Re: Hash values and constants:

I intentionally avoided mentioning & as a way of disambiguate the constant. This is because it will confuse and mislead people to think that you can do &foo; instead of foo(), which isn't the case.
From Re: Re: Forward-referenceing subs:
For some reason, it's much more common to drop the parenthesis when dereferencing than when making a regular subroutine call.
Therefore I consistently use $foo->() as it doesn't leave room for such subtle unexpected behaviour as &$foo; presents.


See perltoc if you don't know which perldoc to read!

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://440488]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-10-28 21:01 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (387 votes). Check out past polls.