Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: cut vs split (suggestions)

by tlm (Prior)
on Apr 17, 2005 at 05:13 UTC ( #448586=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: cut vs split (suggestions)
in thread cut vs split (suggestions)

The internal pipe approach is about 1.5X faster than the pure Perl approach (though still a far cry from cut):

% time perl -le 'open IN, q( cut -d, -f"1-15" numbers.csv| ); \ print join ",", ( chomp and @F = split /,/ ) while <IN>' > /dev/null 19.49s user 0.00s system 96% cpu 20.289 total

Update: But keep in mind that the numbers above are for a relatively fast cut command. The improvement with sk's cut will be more modest; it'd be interesting to see the actual numbers.

the lowliest monk


Comment on Re^3: cut vs split (suggestions)
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://448586]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-10-21 04:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (95 votes), past polls