Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

by bart (Canon)
on Apr 22, 2005 at 17:27 UTC ( #450503=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad
in thread Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

You're not running this with warnings enabled, I'm sure.

And qw is an addition from somewhere in Perl5's history.

  • Comment on Re^2: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://450503]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: 2 weekends ago LanX
[Lotus1]: cb is nsfw this morning
[Lotus1]: I wonder if ascii art would work in the cb....
[jedikaiti]: lolol
Tux looks up his status to find being an Abbot
[choroba]: pm-cb-g now shows the number of unread messages, commit on its way to github
[Tux]: choroba any plans for highlight patterns?
[choroba]: Tux feel free to submit a pull request :-)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-09-20 16:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (237 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?