Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: On Quality

by perrin (Chancellor)
on May 12, 2005 at 15:19 UTC ( #456422=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: On Quality
in thread On Quality

The whole point of coding it beforehand is that later you won't have time to fiddle with coding and testing; whereas right now, you do.

The idea is that if you can build something smaller and faster while keeping the code clean enough to add to later, you can deliver it months earlier. I think we've all seen programmers waste time on pet abstractions in pursuit of a cool architectural idea.

This is one of those comfortable academic ideas that doesn't make much business sense: doing a lot of work on a program, that if done correctly, will result in a product that does the same exactly same thing as it did before, and if done wrong might ruin the product.

If you let things get to the point where refactoring is "a lot of work", you've already screwed up. You're supposed to do it as you build the program, so that you get the benefits of cleaner code while you are building it.

In order to test, you need to know exactly what you're testing, and how. To properly test a section of the program, you need to define what that section does, and how it does it (all preconditions, post conditions, and side effects, etc.) You can't do that until you write the code

At some point, you define the interface. It could be while coding, or it could be while writing tests. You will probably make some changes over time, but the work of defining the interface has to happen anyway, so it's not wasted time.


Comment on Re^3: On Quality

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://456422]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-07-26 20:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (179 votes), past polls