Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

by The Mad Hatter (Priest)
on Jun 22, 2005 at 16:53 UTC ( #469088=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
in thread RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

What's the difference? And would you suggest I use a different term in the module name even though "tag" is the popular term?


Comment on Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
Re^3: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
by jdporter (Canon) on Jun 22, 2005 at 17:08 UTC

    It's not so much that there's a difference, but rather, that people should use different terms for different things, and should continue to use a single well established term for a single thing.

    I think you should consider using the term "keywords" unless it will seriously hinder comprehension and adoption by your target audience.

      If using the word "keywords" will confuse the target audience, then the target audience is far too stupid for you to want to target them with anything less than the Black Death.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://469088]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-12 10:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (239 votes), past polls