Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Perl is more intuitive

by kiat (Vicar)
on Aug 19, 2005 at 15:26 UTC ( #485177=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl is more intuitive
in thread Perl is more intuitive

I'm not sure if this related but imagine nouns in English weren't marked for plurality:

one child->many child
one apple->two apple

1) The apple are good.
2) The apple is good.
3) Many apple are good.
4) One apple is good.

You then probably have to use quantifiers (one, many) or verbs (is, are) to indicate whether you mean a singular instance of the item or many instances.

Additional note:

OTOH, maybe there's some redundancy there. Because the verbs already tell you whether you're talking about a singular entity or a plural one (a case in point: The sheep is still alive vs The sheep are still alive.).

In Chinese, nouns themselves are not marked for plurality. Instead, quantifiers are used to do the job.


Comment on Re^2: Perl is more intuitive
Re^3: Perl is more intuitive
by radiantmatrix (Parson) on Aug 19, 2005 at 15:30 UTC

    Oblig. The Simpsons reference: "We all know Pi(R)**2, but today, pie are justice: I welcome it." (Frederic Tatem)

    <-radiant.matrix->
    Larry Wall is Yoda: there is no try{} (ok, except in Perl6; way to ruin a joke, Larry! ;P)
    The Code that can be seen is not the true Code
    "In any sufficiently large group of people, most are idiots" - Kaa's Law

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://485177]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-22 22:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (132 votes), past polls