Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers

by jk2addict (Chaplain)
on Aug 24, 2005 at 14:58 UTC ( #486222=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers

All very good information. I'm glad we don't all agree here. That's means thought is going on. The one thing I've realized is that my gripe about current sql->oop practices in perl is that the current popular mappers assume the stance that the data access object is the same as my public object/interface. That may be true in some cases; not true or desirable in others....and both sides are OK.

  • Comment on Re: A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers
by herveus (Parson) on Aug 24, 2005 at 17:37 UTC
    Howdy!

    Interesting...

    I had to write a term paper on an "advanced Java server technology" for a Java programming course. I chose to look at Object-Relational Mapping, and focused on something called SimpleORM.

    Some ORMs try to make persistent objects indistinguishable from non-persistent objects, while others force you to directly acknowledge the difference in the code. SimpleORM did the latter (although you could then put a wrapper/facade around DAOs to hide that down the line. Now, one reason I liked SimpleORM was that it doesn't use XML anywhere, and doesn't try to hide the fact that some classes are different because they have a backing store for persistence.

    yours,
    Michael

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://486222]
help
Chatterbox?
[james28909]: i cannot understand how someone cant see that a cloud of gas that evolves into a solar system or galaxies. it just makes sense to me. everythign that has happened, had to have happened for anything on this planet to be.
[james28909]: /gas/gas and debris/
[james28909]: another thing, i used to be atheist. life experiences, personal evidence. and my own perception is the reason why i believe the things i do.
[erix]: and now you are agnostic?
[james28909]: arunbear, your picking bits of history to fit your own narrative. right now, humans are smarter than in any of those times.
[james28909]: in order for there to be a mutation, there has to be a universe with laws setup that even allow a mutation.
[james28909]: everything past the first two things you piked from my posts are irrelevant to me and my beliefs. they are side effects.
[james28909]: two or three. if it has to do with how humans are handling said situations, then that is after they were able to evolve into those problems. agnostic means only believe with evidence. i took that from a tyson video

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (17)
As of 2017-12-15 14:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    What programming language do you hate the most?




















    Results (433 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?