Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

by wazoox (Prior)
on Sep 13, 2005 at 11:29 UTC ( #491551=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

I'm trying to get around this by switching my documentation to robodoc. The main advantage is to be somewhat more compatible with ctags; it also is compatible with many languages, and not only perl; and the default formatters (robodoc to html, etc) give better looking results than corresponding POD translations.

What I still miss is a practical robodoc-to-POD (and reverse) translator, though :)

update: I've finally made it ! It's fa for perfect but it works fine with all my code. See ROBODoc to Pod translator


Comment on Re: Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://491551]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (18)
As of 2014-07-23 14:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (144 votes), past polls