Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

by wazoox (Prior)
on Sep 13, 2005 at 11:29 UTC ( #491551=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

I'm trying to get around this by switching my documentation to robodoc. The main advantage is to be somewhat more compatible with ctags; it also is compatible with many languages, and not only perl; and the default formatters (robodoc to html, etc) give better looking results than corresponding POD translations.

What I still miss is a practical robodoc-to-POD (and reverse) translator, though :)

update: I've finally made it ! It's fa for perfect but it works fine with all my code. See ROBODoc to Pod translator


Comment on Re: Please for the love of god, can I get a documentation format that doesn't suck?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://491551]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (14)
As of 2015-07-07 14:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (89 votes), past polls