Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

by jacques (Priest)
on Sep 21, 2005 at 06:39 UTC ( #493672=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Jacques Transform has a nice ring to it. :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
by ikegami (Pope) on Sep 23, 2005 at 21:57 UTC
    Wouldn't it be Jacques's Transform? But then you end up with too many esses. :)
      No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.
        Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://493672]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2016-12-06 17:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (112 votes). Check out past polls.