Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

by jacques (Priest)
on Sep 21, 2005 at 06:39 UTC ( #493672=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Jacques Transform has a nice ring to it. :)

Comment on Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
by ikegami (Pope) on Sep 23, 2005 at 21:57 UTC
    Wouldn't it be Jacques's Transform? But then you end up with too many esses. :)
      No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.
        Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://493672]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-12-01 06:25 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (795 votes), past polls