Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^3: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

by parv (Priest)
on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:01 UTC ( #494697=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
in thread Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.

Comment on Re^3: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
by ikegami (Pope) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:04 UTC
    Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)
        I kinda view those as the same, but if merlyn says it's called the Jacquonian Transform, who am I to argue! ;)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://494697]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-11-28 00:43 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (735 votes), past polls