Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re^5: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

by merlyn (Sage)
on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:31 UTC ( #494702=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
in thread Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Wouldn't that be more like the Jacquonian Transform then? Not possessive, but derivative. It's not the Schwartz's transform.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

Comment on Re^5: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform
by ikegami (Pope) on Sep 23, 2005 at 23:22 UTC
    I kinda view those as the same, but if merlyn says it's called the Jacquonian Transform, who am I to argue! ;)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://494702]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-10-13 18:59 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (313 votes), past polls