Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Source Vs Binary Installation

by polypompholyx (Chaplain)
on Oct 03, 2005 at 13:48 UTC ( #496917=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Source Vs Binary Installation

I'd say it somewhat depends on the OS you're using. If you're on a Unix of some description, then it's usually easy to make and install modules yourself from source, since you'll likely have gcc, and can therefore deal with pure Perl and XS modules with equal alacrity. If you're on Windows, you may find it easier to use a binary port of perl like the one from ActiveState, and install modules from binary distributions using their PPM tool. There are a few problems with this: the PPM distributions are sometimes out of date or missing; the latest version doesn't seem to update the HTML documentation when you install modules any more; and you can't use certain modules properly (like Inline). If this bugs you, you could always compile perl yourself with Mingw, Microsoft's VCToolkit, or run it inside Cygwin.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://496917]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-04-19 13:58 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?