Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: perltidy IF continuation indentation

by jaa (Friar)
on Oct 05, 2005 at 13:16 UTC ( #497584=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: perltidy IF continuation indentation
in thread perltidy IF continuation indentation

Yes - I have seen the man page for -i and -ci. Having used the perlstyle guidelines for a few years, we are finding it an adjustment (we miss our cuddled elses!) :) but it does seem to have a certain internal consistency. One thing we do really like is the new cascading trinary operator layout. We used to just use whatever seemed right at the time.

Which specific part of PBP style don't you like - and for what reason?

Regards,

Jeff


Comment on Re^4: perltidy IF continuation indentation
Re^5: perltidy IF continuation indentation
by sauoq (Abbot) on Oct 05, 2005 at 18:57 UTC
    Which specific part of PBP style don't you like - and for what reason?

    I don't own the book (nor do I expect to buy it.) I thumbed through it, and I just don't think it would be very helpful to me. Some of it I agree with and follow anyway, and some of it I just wouldn't. As for style in particular, well, here's my .perltidyrc:

    -ce -nsfs -isbc -olc

    Update: So... I'm curious... are people downvoting this node (currently +0 -3) simply because I refuse to idolize PBP and its illustrious author? Oh well. Sorry, but the more I think about it, the more convinced I become that if you're going to write "best practices" for a whole language, you better be pretty general and leave style issues alone altogether. Which practices are best usually depends on context. I suppose PBP is fine if you are just dropping sheaves of code from the top of your ivory tower though. Besides, a name like Perl Pretty Good Practices In Many Situations wouldn't have been nearly so catchy.

    -sauoq
    "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
    
      So... I'm curious... are people downvoting this node...simply because I refuse to idolize PBP and its illustrious author?

      Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I certainly didn't downvote you because you refuse to idolize me or my book. I'm actually rather grateful to you for that.

      I wouldn't have downvoted the node at all, or even commented on it, except for your update, in which--although you freely admit you haven't actually read the book--you still choose to dismiss it with a snide:

      "fine if you are just dropping sheaves of code from the top of your ivory tower"

      I don't consider that informed or constructive criticism, but that alone would still not be sufficient reason to downvote your node.

      The real problem is that ad hominem rhetorical manipulations of that kind are not in the true Perl Monks spirit, and undermine the sense of generosity, honesty, and mutual support that make this community so very special.

      To paraphrase Burke: "All that is necessary for cynicism and negativty to flourish is for good Monks to do nothing." That's why I downvoted your node.

        Ah, well, at least you said why. I do appreciate that.

        Before I explain further, I would like you to know that I didn't really mean to attack you personally with the "ivory tower" comment but I can certainly see how it could seem that way. I'll try to clarify that in a moment...

        I'm sure it's obvious to you that, when I wrote that, I hadn't yet read the preface to PBP. That changed this evening when, after taking the family out for pizza, we all wandered into a nearby bookstore and I gave your book a little more attention than I did in my initial skimming. Funny choice of words that "ivory tower" phrase, huh? Yum... Toe jam.

        Anyway, I said I'd explain what I meant so I will. I didn't actually intend to single you out with the "dropping sheaves" comment, but meant to convey that if the bulk of one's development took place in isolation, without pre-existing coding standards (and lots of pre-existing code) then the wholesale adoption of the practices you set forth in PBP would, in fact, be fine. Otherwise, one would have to take many other things into consideration before adopting those practices. And, my last comment about not naming the book Perl Pretty Good Practices was meant to convey that I felt sure you knew that, despite the book's absolute sounding name.

        In retrospect, it's obvious that my choice to be abrasive didn't mix at all well with a serious sentiment and that touch of facetiousness. I not only expressed my thoughts poorly, but as a nasty little bonus you, quite naturally, felt attacked.

        So, I'm sorry. Please accept my apology.

        Oh, one last thing... I've thought some about why I chose to be abrasive. There are two reasons. For one, I was really perplexed over why this little subthread was attracting downvotes at all. I was frustrated with it because, well, I usually know why when my nodes go negative and I couldn't figure it out. I know that happens, but I let it get the better of me. (Shame on me.) The second reason is hazier, but it sort of boils down to being irritated with this nagging feeling that buying your book is almost obligatory. It seems as if it has already been pretty successful (congrats, btw) and has seen wide-spread acceptance. The OP being a case in point. And I almost feel as if I have to buy your book if I don't want to be left out of the loop just because it's likely to have a real impact on the whole community. And, I guess that irritates me because, damnit, I already have shelf after shelf of O'Reilly books, a good many with "Perl" in the title, and though some of them came in handy once (like the 1st and 2nd edition of the Camel) most of them aren't really much use to me and were purchased purely out of some sick and bizarre compulsion to hoard attractively colored flat-bound paperback technical books with titles printed neatly in Adobe ITC Garamond on covers decorated with 19th century engravings from the Dover Pictorial Archive. Mind you, this didn't really bother me until I needed to move twice within the span of a year and had to lug them along with me.

        Actually, I imagine if I did buy your book, I'd find some interesting things in it and I'd probably even adopt a few of the practices you recommend. But, after a couple of weeks, it'd just become another brightly colored rectangle on my shelf. So, as much as I'd like to buy it for those few choice nuggets, I'm going to take a pass.

        Edit: reworded the fourth paragraph so that it actually parses as English and makes some sense.

        -sauoq
        "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://497584]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-09-19 20:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (145 votes), past polls