OT: Debunking the "Level Playing Field"

by grantm (Parson)

on Oct 31, 2005 at 07:47 UTC ( [id://504185]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

The term "Level Playing Field" always reminds me of this amusing article from the CDU (Consultant Debunking Unit) at FastCompany.com.

Having worked for one of the big consulting firms, I'd have to say there's plenty more debunking required.

Comment on OT: Debunking the "Level Playing Field"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: OT: Debunking the "Level Playing Field" by grantm (Parson) on Nov 28, 2005 at 21:15 UTC
And if anyone requires more evidence that real playing fields are not level, check out this photo.	[reply]
Re^2: OT: Debunking the "Level Playing Field" by QM (Parson) on Nov 28, 2005 at 23:49 UTC
Funny, it's all below water level, as far as I can tell ;) -QM -- Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://504185]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)

As of 2024-04-20 00:27 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found